You already know your PnL. This tells you why.
Ingate reads your own Hyperliquid fill history and runs nine checks on it — sizing after losses, what you do after a bad day, how long you hold losers. Free, no wallet connection, nothing to sign.
Nine things your PnL will not tell you.
Every check exists to catch a habit that looks fine on a good week and empties an account on a bad one. Your total profit is not one of them.
Risk-adjusted return
Return per unit of volatility over a wallet’s whole history. Rejects 300% made by running maximum leverage into a trend that happened to hold.
Position sizing
Whether size answers conviction or the last result. Rejects martingale — doubling into losers until one comes back.
Drawdown control
Depth and duration of losing periods, not the single worst day. Rejects a record that spends a year underwater and reports only its maximum drawdown.
Concentration
How much of lifetime profit came from the largest few positions. Rejects one lucky trade carrying an otherwise flat record.
Fee & funding drag
Realised cost as a share of gross profit, funding included. Rejects an edge that is real gross and gone net.
Strategy stability
Whether a wallet still trades the way it used to. Rejects a trader whose edge was real in one regime and who has quietly become someone else.
Distance to liquidation
How close positions were allowed to run to being wiped out. Rejects a record that survived by two percent and calls it risk control.
Winners vs losers held
Whether losers are held longer than winners. Rejects the disposition effect, which flatters a win rate while draining the account.
Recovery after a loss
What leverage does in the days following a large loss. Rejects revenge trading, which shows up in the data long before it shows up in your balance.
Nine questions, asked of the data.
Pick any wallet. Each check below is computed from that wallet’s own trades, drawn so you can see what it found, and explained without the algebra. The formulas are one click away if you want them.
Composite and calibration
Each component is mapped to its cross-sectional percentile within the eligible universe, so no absolute cut-off is invented: S = 100 · Σ wⱼ · rankⱼ.
The weights wⱼ are not chosen by hand. They are fitted out of sample and only on data held back from every allocation decision. Until that fit is complete the composite runs equal-weighted, and it is reported as equal-weighted.
Formulas make the method falsifiable and reproducible. They do not make it correct. Whether these components predict how a wallet performs under allocated capital is settled by out-of-sample results against a control, not by the algebra above.
Paste an address. See the nine.
Yours or anyone else's. Nine checks run against that wallet's own Hyperliquid history. Free, no wallet connection, nothing to sign.
What the score refuses to look at.
Every leaderboard on Hyperliquid ranks you by profit. Profit tells you what happened, not whether it will happen again. These are the things we deliberately do not count.
The terminal is being built.
Scoring a wallet reads history. The terminal is the other half: trade Hyperliquid through it and these nine numbers update on every fill, so you can see whether the habit you are trying to fix is actually fixing.
It is not open yet. Leave a wallet address and that address is on the list — when the terminal opens, connecting it is how you get in.
Preview of the tracking view · simulated four-week run
The address is the key: when the terminal opens, connecting that wallet gets you in. No signature, no connection now, and the email is optional — the address alone is enough.